Redressing the decline of youth achieving employment within Europe’s advertising trades

The European Institute for Commercial Commnucations Education (edcom) is currently conducting a research study that intends to be the starting point of a two year project aiming at redressing the decline of youth achieving employment within Europe’s advertising trades. The pan-European research focuses on the problems and needs of the students, graduates, young professionals, academics and agencies in the field of commercial communications, and consists of several in-depth interviews with representatives of each of the target groups. Hereby we introduce some of the reflections we have received from the interviewees, hoping that an open and sincere debate among different agents will lead to a common front to solve the problem.

Commercial communications students

All commercial communications students interviewed consider a job in the advertising industry because they would like to practice what they love doing, because they believe it is a big opportunity for both creative and analytic people, and because it offers an environment full of “amazing” people from whom they can learn things by stealing their craft. They felt encouraged to study commercial communications because they want to become like the people they know from the industry (competitive and skilled) and because it is a challenging field.

They believe graduates from commercial communications degrees are hired because of their persistence, bravery, skills, creativity, enthusiasm for the job (which comes out of passion) and their will to learn fast and be as efficient as they can. Creativity, they say, is not only useful in the creative department, but also in the process of making a business work at its full potential. Also, they state graduates have a better understanding of how agencies work because of their studies, but also by the academic internships they have done. Overall, the skills they think agencies value in a future employee for a graduate role are creativity, self-control, self-confidence, social intelligence, artistic intelligence, organisation, charisma, consistency, stubbornness and determination. All interviewees believe their own profiles are attractive to future employers in advertising.

Apart from that, interviewees state that there is a gap between the graduates’ expectations and what happens in real life. The advertising industry, they say, is one of the most attractive industries and everybody sees the best part of it (fun, creativity, awards, success, money, etc,) but not necessarily understand how much hard work is behind it, and how frustrating and difficult it can be to work in. Interviewees also mention that certain students think that internships are a waste of time and consider extra time at work to be a form of exploitation, and do not see the benefits it offers in the early years of their careers. Moreover, they believe that the reason why some graduates do not get hired is because they are not passionate enough about advertising, and because sometimes they are not willing to assume responsibilities. To work in advertising, one student says: “you need to be very passionate, ambitious and stay focused on your way.”

All the interviewees state that their current degree does not provide them with all the necessary skills to start working immediately in advertising. They say professors tend to offer theoretical knowledge only, and that practical workshops and certain digital tools are for beginners, forcing them to learn at home how to properly use these tools for professional purposes. One of the interviewees states that through her studies she has significantly improved her strategic thinking in advertising. When asked what would they like to see differently in their curriculum, degree, university or education programme, their answer is more practice, more updated content, more workshops, competitions, professional encouragement from advertising agencies, conferences with people and positive examples of advertising, summer and winter internships, more classes supported by industry people and practical courses in advertising agencies.

Regarding initiatives to be undertaken by universities to encourage employability in the advertising industry, students insist on having more workshops, internships, close collaboration with advertising industry, conferences, open doors sessions for students, and interactive workshops. They appreciate universities invite keynote speakers on a regular basis, which is interesting for both parties to boost collaboration and create a positive impact to students and professionals. One of the students expressed his dissatisfaction about the importance that is given to theoretical knowledge and the need to memorize concepts by heart, and states: “we are not really encouraged to express our own vision of a subject.” When inquired about initiatives, agencies should firmly grasp to encourage employability, for instance by recruiting students through competitions or by performing practical exams and keep monitoring their skills and performance. The  idea of a formal job interview is appalling to young people. “Some of my colleagues are not self-confident because of their own timidity to face a formal job interview,” one student adds.

The interviewees state that the creative hub should pay more attention to new generations and get to know them better. Unpaid internships, they say, can be very frustrating if they do not guarantee being hired after trial period is over. In their opinion, agencies should rethink internship programmes, which should be seen as a period of accommodation for the trainees prior to a selection carried out by agencies. These students believe that the best candidates should stay in the programme, even if it means being paid less than a standard salary, but which will encourage them to stay motivated. Also, they see the need of being aware of hiring possibilities and new platforms (such as IQads) that regularly announce jobs in agencies, creative events and festivals. They all manifest true interest in networking, and they believe it is good for students, but also for the agencies, as it gives them the opportunity to better understand the students’ expectations.

To sum up, the interviewees believe that a good university lecturer in commercial communications should have excellent oral and creative communication skills and emotional, artistic and social intelligence. A good lecturer should also embrace the differences between all students, not making them feel like they are not good enough, and encouraging them to overcome their fears and develop their horizons. Some teachers, they say, tend to only teach theoretical courses and do not pay attention to a student’s real needs. Students ask for more accurate and up-to-date facts, more case studies, new trends, and lectures that can help them develop their capabilities to analyse ads and campaigns from a business, strategic and creative point of view.

Commercial communications graduates, interns and young professionals

Commercial communications graduates, interns and young professionals interviewed have different opinions regarding the level of difficulty of getting a job in the advertising industry and have experienced different processes from being students, into graduating and finding a job. Some of them believe that the advertising industry is dynamic and that there are enough job opportunities, while others state that, even though it is easy to find an internship position, it is hard for young professionals to consolidate a job. All of them did an academic internship as part of their study programme, which gave them more confidence and knowledge. One of them was hired by the agency at the end of the internship period, and the two others were not. From those, one is currently looking for another internship, while the other is working for an agency, after having dedicated eight years to another profession.

Interviewees state that there are many graduates with a different degree rather than commercial communications working in advertising industry (graphic and web designers, computer engineers, economists, business administration graduates, marketing graduates, etc.). In their opinion, the reason behind this is that a degree in commercial communication is too generic and theory-based, and that certain topics are not covered enough, such as digital communications. They also mention that some agencies may have the wrong preconceptions regarding the true potential of commercial communication graduates, believing that graphic and web designers are better for creative positions, and marketing and business management graduates are better at numbers. However, the interviewees believe these preconceptions are not accurate, and they revindicate the global perspective they bring to the agencies, and the quality they bring to their contents.

Interviewees believe that universities that educate commercial communications should update their curricula and use a more practical approach. They say that some of their professors at university lacked training and were outdated, and they appreciate the performance of certain associated professors who worked in the industry and brought relevant and updated contents into the class. The interviewees noted that their curricula were focused a lot on creativity, but not too much on other aspects such as media, digital communications, business management or marketing. They also expressed that in their education, they lacked some knowledge about the everyday reality of agencies: different job positions and tasks, general strategies, how to prepare budgets, how to use Excel, how to select the mediums and media, metrics, etc.  Overall, most of the interviewees state that the contents provided by their universities were not sufficient, and that at the beginning they felt quite incompetent in their professional roles because of their degree. Finally, they believe that universities should include more and more diversified internship opportunities in their curricula, that those internship periods should start from the first academic year and that they should be with agencies who are committed to train and hire young professionals.

According to their beliefs, the interviewees feared that some agencies are not using the internships to seek and train talent, but to get cheap or free labor. Apart from that, they state that some of the internship positions are abusive in terms of hours and responsibility, and therefore some changes in the legislation would be required in certain countries. In their opinion, agencies should stop taking advantage of the situation and become more socially conscious by giving a chance to those who performed well during their internship. They believe agencies should see the trainees as possible future employees, appreciate their potential and train them the best possible way so they can be hired at the end of the internship. However, interviewees believe that when agencies need to hire someone, they normally go for someone with a more experienced profile, creating a vicious circle for young professionals, whose lack of experience blocks them from being hired and get the experience they need. In general, interviewees believed that agencies tend to give a lot of value to the experience of the candidate, and do not appreciate as much any of the other aspects that young professionals can bring to the table, such us openess for change, commitment and the capability to adapt.

As for the initiatives the interviewees took or could have taken to encourage their own employability, they mention the importance of staying up to date through training on a frequent basis, being proactive in the search of agencies who are hiring young professionals, and never stop creating contents and participating in contests which could enlarge your portfolio and curriculum.

Winning the edcom Thesis Competition

In this month’s blog, we would like to draw your attention to two theses that excelled at the edcom Thesis Competition 2017-2018.

The edcom Thesis Competition rewards the best Bachelor and Master theses on advertising or commercial communications among edcom member schools. This year, the competition welcomed 21 entries from 10 European countries in both categories. The bar was set high and judges appreciated the level of the entries.

The winning entries passed through three rounds of judging with flying colours. In the first round, entries were judged upon their relevance to the field of commercial communications. In the subsequent round, the papers were judged upon the following criteria: Strong objectives (10%); Clearly developed methodology (20%); Results fitting to the proposed objectives (30%); Conclusions based on the objectives and suggestions for further research (20%); Consistency & coherence (20%). The final three theses in each category where then evaluated according to their novelty (does the thesis offer a new and original insight) and scale (what is the magnitude of the achievement).

The winning Bachelor Thesis

In this category, the thesis of Caitlin Brands, student at Avans Hogeschool, Netherlands, stood out. The thesis entitled: “Mobile interactivity meets the Out of Home industry ‘A mediating instrument to fill in the market gap’” aims to close the bridge between media agencies, advertisers and consumers.

The main question that arose in the beginning of the paper is: “how can an interactive scanning application be used as a mediating instrument to fill in the gap between these three key players on the Out-of-Home media industry?”. Caitlin explains how she carried out an exploratory and qualitative research in order to assess the current situation. The research was designed by using established models, such as the Business Model Canvas, the Value Proposition Canvas and Porter’s Five Forces as a first step.

The second part of her research consisted of exploratory interviews. The interviews were held by roaming the streets to gain as many insights on the needs of the target group as possible. The last step was to hold brainstorming sessions. Ideas that had been gathered and tested based on technical applicability, practical applicability, feasibility and suitability by conducting semi-structured interviews with experts in all relevant fields were presented to all key players.

The findings of the paper were:

  • Media agencies need to shift their focus from B2B to B2C and preferably from a consumer’s perspective.
  • End users need to be targeted very specifically in order to convince them to engage with a brand.
  • All three key players  (media agencies, advertisers and consumers) share different interests and want to gain a personal advantage before committing to an interactive application: media agencies want to use the application as a tool to gather data they could not gather before, consumers want to get discounts or specific information on a brand, and advertisers want to increase brand engagement and customer loyalty.

Caitlin concludes that all those findings make the interactive scanning application (called ‘Capture’) a mediating instrument which generates real-time data when consumers use the application, including a loyalty program for consumers that increases brand engagement at the same time.

The judges commented that her research stood out to them because of the relevance of this topic and hypothesis in today’s industry. In addition, Caitlin had a good approach with a different touch point (CANVAS) and had smart recommendation for the “Capture” model.

More information about her research can be found here, or click on the image to enlarge the poster.

 

Click on the image for full resolution. 

The winning Master Thesis

In the Master category, the thesis that impressed the judges the most was: “Hospitality living LAB- A communications device to control satisfaction with tourism and quality of life in the city”, by Patricia Oliveira, student at IADE University, Portugal.

The basic idea of Patricia’s thesis is that City Tourism has known some of the fastest growth in the world and its changing nature becomes increasingly apparent in many cities, including Lisbon. In her summary, Patricia states that access to information through mobile devices is constant and tourists seek to find and consume local experiences where interaction with residents becomes an important aspect. Although the impact of ICT (information and communication technologies) in the tourism industry as well as in the behaviour of tourists and travel experiences has been recognised, Patricia argues that the implication of this new type of urban tourism needs more attention from managers of cities.

The judges were very impressed with the level of her research, which she folded out in an interesting, practical and relevant way. Another aspect that grabbed the attention of the judges was that the insight of the research started from a very rational and objective need, namely the time management of tourists, even during short trips.

More information about her research can be found here, or click on the image to enlarge the poster.

Click on the image for full resolution.

Awarding the winners

To recognise their success, Caitlin and Patricia will be awarded with a €400 cash prize and both of their universities will receive a €400 voucher to be used on Educational EACA and edcom initiatives. In addition, all finalists will receive a merit certificate to recognise their great work and efforts.

The next edition of the edcom Thesis Competition will be launched on 3 September 2018. For more details please visit our website.

Helping universities developing their Teaching and Learning Strategies

In today’s fast-paced world, universities not only need to keep up with the development of knowledge but they also need to be the ones leading the process. This is the message that EUA (European University Association) wants to send out with their released document: Ten Principles for Enhancing Learning & Teaching at the European Level.

The EUA designed this set of principles with the aim to enhance and support existing initiatives in learning and teaching, and to ensure higher education remains attractive in Europe. Furthermore, this set of principles arose as a need to bridge differences and communication issues between the academic institutes of different countries, as well as the need to give guidance on different issues that were concerning academia from the European area. Its mission to support institutions with learning and teaching is a shared task which does not only concern students and teachers, but also other stakeholders within the institution.

The ten principles can be listed as follows:

  1. The higher education learning experience nurtures and enables the development of learners as active and responsible citizens, critical thinkers, problem solvers, equipped for life-long learning.
  2. Learning and teaching is learner-centred.
  3. Commitment to learning and teaching is integral to the purpose, mission and strategy of the university.
  4. Institutional leadership actively promotes and enables the advancement of learning and teaching.
  5. Learning and teaching is a collaborative and collegial process involving collaboration across the university and with the wider community.
  6. Learning, teaching and research are interconnected and mutually enriching.
  7. Teaching is core to academic practice and is respected as scholarly and professional.
  8. The university community actively explores and cherishes a variety of approaches to learning and teaching that respect a diversity of learners, stakeholders, and disciplines.
  9. Sustainable resources and structures are required to support and enable learning and teaching enhancement.
  10. Institutional QA for learning and teaching aims at enhancement, and is a shared responsibility of staff and students.

In a recent webinar on the topic, Dr. Oliver Vettori, Dean Accreditation & Quality Management Director from the WU Vienna, presented a case study on how his university tried to create an effective Teaching and Learning strategy based on these ten principles. Their TLS (Teaching and Learning Strategy) dates about four years back and was developed in the context of international accreditations. When developing it, they tried to make sure that it is externally resonant.

The TLS that they built was expected to be grounded upon the following values:

  1. Foster enthusiasm
  2. Value diversity
  3. Advocate an open mind
  4. Assume responsibility
  5. Work together
  6. Act reflectively

 

The main idea of this TLS was that the teachers would foster enthusiasm that they could pass on to the learners. Furthermore, they also wanted to value diversity on all levels with regard to different learners, different expectations, different needs, but also to different approaches. In addition, teachers and learners needed to work together, and act reflectively while working together, in order to be successful. Dr. Oliver Vettori concludes that: “These six values were kind of the cornerstone but they didn’t tell us where we want to invest our efforts.”

As a result, Dr. Oliver Vettori decided to construct four key orientations to define the areas in which their strategy would develop. The strategy was built so that it would be responsive to the external expectations and suit everyone within their institution. This strategy would ultimately work as a framework. However, the strategy started to show weaknesses when they tried to implement it and induce the internal changes that were required. In order to detect this weakness, WU Vienna conducted a comparative research project in which they examined various Teaching and Learning Strategies from all across the world, mostly from Europe.

The conclusion of their research surprised Dr. Vettori and his team. As opposed to present features such as frequent mentioning of graduate attributes and mindsets, focus on conditions for teaching and learning and attention to frequent issues, such as equity, sustainability and employability, the majority of Teaching and Learning Strategies showed a significant absence of teaching as an active actor. In these TLSs, there was no mention of teaching methodologies, pedagogic and didactic concepts, no explicit definition of teaching and learning, and perhaps most importantly, no reference to teachers as actors. What’s more, neither teachers or students appear in active roles in these strategies, but as passive recipients of the action. Dr. Vettori concludes that, even though these strategies were portraying a legitimate framework in correspondence with other strategies, they rarely give any indication of concrete action or measures to drive teaching forward.

To sum things up: universities should focus their strategies on the implementation process from the very beginning, as well as paying attention to revising these strategies internally. Dr. Vettori adds: “We need to ask ourselves what exactly our understanding is of student-centered learning. We can have a political ideology and understanding, but we can also try to pin down what it actually means in the classroom and beyond”. Furthermore, strategies should include measurable targets in order to be successful, rather than just following its intentions.

What everybody should learn from this experience is that thinking about the implementation from the very start when developing a strategy can make a substantial difference. Documents, such as  “The 10 European Principles for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching “ are therefore designed to help universities create these strategies.

For more information about the ten principles, click  here. A video with the recording of the webinar can be found here.